close
Sign up/Login to read the full article
LOGIN FORM
Email address :  
Password :  
Forgot your password?
Register
Cover Story
Cover Story
A court adrift
 Share  ·    Comment (5)   ·    print   ·  
S. Subramanium The Supreme Court of India.

The Supreme Court by and large remains popular. Yet, if one digs a bit, beneath the surface is an institution that has strayed from its mission and may even be undermining the rest of the judicial system. By NICK ROBINSON


Register to get full access to this article

Login | New user

Bookmark

Comments:

Our higher courts are depressing. The courts are basically for the Judges and Lawyers; the
litigants time, money, and his/her distress occupies very less
work/emotion physical space of the courts.
from:  niranjani shetty
Posted on: Apr 27, 2013 at 10:58 IST
This pro-rich bias was recently shown by the SC in Sanjay Dutt's Case....
Need of the hour is to go from unitary to federal judiciary!
from:  Mansoor Ahmad
Posted on: Apr 24, 2013 at 11:36 IST
First, kudos to Nick Robinson for articulating an eye-opener. I always attached utmost respect for The Supreme Court as I reckoned it was amongst the only few institutions free from widespread corruption and malpractices. That The Supreme Court is selective in hearing cases, sets aside the Constitutional cases and is reluctant to judicial reforms comes as a rude shock to many students like me. One hopes the Parliament is able to influence positively and kick starts the much needed reform process.
from:  Maloth Dinesh Jadhav
Posted on: Apr 21, 2013 at 18:33 IST
A well analysed article. The Supreme Court has made it abundantly clear through its actions that it is for the affluent and those who can afford to engage well known advocates. It has rather made it a practice to listen only to those whom it cannot afford to displease. The statistics shared by the author are quite revealing and it is the misfortune of this country that the Supreme court Court should have degenerated so much and there is no one even to acknowledge this in public. Well done Frontline.

I very much like the concluding remarks "Journalists and editors routinely err on the side of caution when reporting on the court so as not to risk contempt. In order for the broader public to be actively involved in shaping a vision for the court’s future, its faults must be carefully scrutinised along with its strengths."
from:  B.Vaidyanathan
Posted on: Apr 21, 2013 at 08:40 IST
The law commission report suggeted the idea of forming regional benches. It was welcome suggestion and should be implemented. As far as coordination is concerned, it could be handled by information technology,its also important because of large geographical area.
from:  BADAL CHOURASIA
Posted on: Apr 20, 2013 at 13:22 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
Frontline
Cover Story
Recent Articles

LATEST COMMENTS

TDP: Telugu Modi
 Author doesn't seem to have the correct analysis of the present situation in seemandhra... He doesnt seem to know the danger of a corrupt po...»
posted by charan teja   on Apr 18, 2014 at 07:50 IST

Son’s challenge
 YSRC will do well in rural constituencies and TDP is likely to do well in urban constituencies of coastal: YSRC likely to get close to 100 o...»
posted by anil kunar   on Apr 18, 2014 at 10:47 IST

A new Cold War?
 One of the most elaborate and nuanced analysis about the Crimean crisis....»
posted by George M   on Apr 17, 2014 at 10:22 IST

Social


Please remember to logout of facebook after you complete this session.

O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in Cover Story

Leaders of non-Congress, non-BJP parties in New Delhi in February.

Vital pieces of a jigsaw

Regional and identity-based parties will continue to retain fragmented spaces of political influence in the national polity after the 2014 e »