Sign up/Login to read the full article
Email address :  
Password :  
Forgot your password?
Cover Story
Cover Story
A court adrift
 Share  ·    Comment (5)   ·    print   ·  
S. Subramanium The Supreme Court of India.

The Supreme Court by and large remains popular. Yet, if one digs a bit, beneath the surface is an institution that has strayed from its mission and may even be undermining the rest of the judicial system. By NICK ROBINSON

Register to get full access to this article

Login | New user



Our higher courts are depressing. The courts are basically for the Judges and Lawyers; the
litigants time, money, and his/her distress occupies very less
work/emotion physical space of the courts.
from:  niranjani shetty
Posted on: Apr 27, 2013 at 10:58 IST
This pro-rich bias was recently shown by the SC in Sanjay Dutt's Case....
Need of the hour is to go from unitary to federal judiciary!
from:  Mansoor Ahmad
Posted on: Apr 24, 2013 at 11:36 IST
First, kudos to Nick Robinson for articulating an eye-opener. I always attached utmost respect for The Supreme Court as I reckoned it was amongst the only few institutions free from widespread corruption and malpractices. That The Supreme Court is selective in hearing cases, sets aside the Constitutional cases and is reluctant to judicial reforms comes as a rude shock to many students like me. One hopes the Parliament is able to influence positively and kick starts the much needed reform process.
from:  Maloth Dinesh Jadhav
Posted on: Apr 21, 2013 at 18:33 IST
A well analysed article. The Supreme Court has made it abundantly clear through its actions that it is for the affluent and those who can afford to engage well known advocates. It has rather made it a practice to listen only to those whom it cannot afford to displease. The statistics shared by the author are quite revealing and it is the misfortune of this country that the Supreme court Court should have degenerated so much and there is no one even to acknowledge this in public. Well done Frontline.

I very much like the concluding remarks "Journalists and editors routinely err on the side of caution when reporting on the court so as not to risk contempt. In order for the broader public to be actively involved in shaping a vision for the court’s future, its faults must be carefully scrutinised along with its strengths."
from:  B.Vaidyanathan
Posted on: Apr 21, 2013 at 08:40 IST
The law commission report suggeted the idea of forming regional benches. It was welcome suggestion and should be implemented. As far as coordination is concerned, it could be handled by information technology,its also important because of large geographical area.
Posted on: Apr 20, 2013 at 13:22 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
Volume: 31
Issue: 15
Issue Date: 08-08-2014




The power of the myth

Myths have not only survived science and technology but will continue to fascinate creative minds wh»


C.P. Chandrasekhar

The missing honeymoon

The new government’s decisiveness in ensuring quick clearances, and incentives for lending, for larg»


Terror from the skies
 @Peter Almagor. While it is said that Nazis,created atmosphere in which the oppressed were trapped in camps and not allowed enough food,hos...»
posted by r kumar   on Aug 1, 2014 at 22:43 IST

Roots of Indian secularism
 Several leaders from diverse groups and parties have contributed significantly to Indian independence movement and it would be ignorance to ...»
posted by Dr.Ananth Naveen   on Aug 2, 2014 at 01:47 IST

Anatomy of romance
 Bollywood sometimes produce good movies, Rang De Basanti can be considered as one. It shall be talked and discuss for year to come. Many mor...»
posted by Akash Daimari   on Jul 31, 2014 at 20:08 IST


Please remember to logout of facebook after you complete this session.



Recent Article in Cover Story

Workers under the MGNREGS clean up a canal near Thiruvananthapuram, a file photograph. The Survey claims that the rural employment guarantee scheme has caused a wage-price spiral and led to a shortage of agricultural labour.

‘Free market’ manifesto

The Economic Survey, while containing rich empirical material, is limited hugely by its unswerving faith in the “optimality” of free markets »