The Nation
The riot route
By Ajoy Ashirwad Mahaprashasta in Muzaffarnagar
 Share  ·    Comment (16)   ·    print   ·  
Sushil Kumar Verma A damaged mosque at Kutba, one of the villages in Muzaffarnagar district affected by the riots.
 Try to write the truth rather fabrication.
And many a times while reading the article I felt you are writing a judgement and not a news article.
from: Ashish Srivastav
Oct 2, 2013 at 16:08 IST

The riots in Muzaffarnagar following the killing of two Jats and a Muslim sharpen the communal polarisation in western Uttar Pradesh. By AJOY ASHIRWAD MAHAPRASHASTA in Muzaffarnagar

KAWAL, one of the largest villages in Muzaffarnagar district, was a quintessential village, divided into two distinct halves, in western Uttar Pradesh. The land-holding Jats in the north are separated from the affluent Muslim households in the south by a cluster of houses belonging to Dalit and Muslim agricultural workers. Despite the segregation, the communities have always remained economically dependent on each other. The poor Muslims and Dalits worked mostly in the sugarcane farms of the Jats while some Muslims and a small section of Sainis controlled the commercial enterprises. Kawal gradually began to earn the reputation of being a harmonious and business-friendly village, an extraordinary feat at a time when communal tension was at its peak in the State after the demolition of the Babri Masjid in December 1992.

In the first week of September, however, high tension following the murder of a Muslim boy in the village snowballed into a major communal riot, claiming 36 lives and injuring many. Many Muslims have fled the village. The village, which was populated by Muslims and Hindus in equal numbers, was now a Hindu-majority village. The Muslims who have stayed back refuse to work in fields owned by the Jats and have decided to send their children to Chennai, an attractive work destination for the region’s Muslim folk, who mostly trade in cloth. The Jats and the Sainis, on the other hand, have become insecure and communalised despite being in a majority, a sentiment usually exploited by the Bharatiya Janta Party and the larger Sangh Parivar.

In fact, Kawal is not the only village in Muzaffarnagar to have witnessed such communal polarisation and a resulting demographic transformation. In most of the riot-affected villages Frontline visited, these two facets of the riots that continued for two days are visible. In all the villages where the Hindus were predominant, the Muslims have left their homes. And the reverse has happened in Muslim-majority villages though such villages are comparatively fewer in number. This has unsettled the socio-economic framework of Muzaffarnagar and the adjoining districts where the Muslim population is somewhere close to 40 per cent, according to the 2011 Census. Such massive changes happened within a week after an altercation in Kawal on August 27, which claimed three lives.

Immediate causes

Around 1 p.m on August 27, two Jats of neighbouring Mallikpura village, killed a Muslim boy following an altercation. Soon, a Muslim mob lynched the two men. The Jats of the region rallied in thousands for the cremation of the two community members. On their way back from the cremation, the Jats entered the Muslim colony of Kawal in tractors and motorbikes and allegedly looted and vandalised Muslim houses and shops. They also destroyed the property of a mosque. Mosques and the homes of Muslim agricultural workers, who have now fled, were the worst affected in the attack.

A Muslim resident of Kawal told Frontline: “They came here to destroy our property. They were armed with sickles and country-made pistols. They were shouting slogans such as Jao Pakistan, warna Kabristan (Go to Pakistan or graveyard), Hindu ekta zindabad (Long live Hindu unity), and Ek ke badle ek 100 (For one life, we will claim 100 lives). I agree the Jat boys should not have been killed. The culprit should be booked and convicted. We got entrapped in the whole fight. And now we have nowhere to go except to live in fear.”

Clearly, the Jat rally was not spontaneous and the inflammatory slogans point to political planning. On August 29, a video circulating among the Hindus showed two men being beaten to death by a Muslim mob, creating the impression that it was the recording of the killing of the two Jats in Kawal. The police confirmed that it was a two-year-old video from Pakistan, which was available on Youtube.

As the video began to stoke communal tension in the area, a few Jat leaders called for a mahapanchayat, a sort of a general body meeting of Jats, to discuss pertinent issues. This time, the mahapanchayat was called to “defend Jat honour against the aggressive Muslims”. Many prominent regional leaders of the BJP such as Hukum Singh, Sangeet Som and Suresh Rana attended the meeting along with Naresh and Rakesh Tikait, leaders of the Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU), a farmers union started by their father Mahendra Singh Tikait, who was a Jat patriarch. The Congress leader Harendra Malik, also a Jat, attended the meeting.

The BJP’s narrative of the altercation in Kawal became the main theme at the mahapanchayat. According to the BJP, the incident is the result of the Muslim boy teasing the minor sister of the two slain Jats. Muslims of Kawal, however, deny this charge. According to them, and the first information report, the altercation was over a trivial matter concerning motorbikes. Some Dalits in the village, however, told Frontline that the boy and the Jat girl were in a relationship and that the Jats tried to prevent him from meeting her. It could be a case of honour killing, they say.

However, at the mahapanchayat, the leaders called the Jats to defend the honour of “their women”. The mahapanchayat came to be known as Bahu, Beti Bachao Mahasammelan (Save your daughter-in law and daughter). After the meeting, the dispersing crowd attacked Muslim homes en route to their respective villages. The violence gradually spread to Muzaffarnagar town and other villages. The Muslim leadership, in response, organised its own panchayats to counter the violence and to organise themselves.

Polarisation & politics

In the aftermath of the riots, the people in the region are clearly divided on communal lines. Taking advantage of the demographic transformation, the Samajwadi Party (S.P.), in order to consolidate its image as a pro-Muslim party, has been organising relief camps for the displaced Muslims. As many as nine concentrated relief camps organised by Muslim leaders of the S.P. are functioning in Muzaffarnagar and Shamli districts. Yadavs are not predominant in the western districts of Uttar Pradesh, including Shaamli, Meerut, Baghpat, and Sahranpur. The S.P., which is generally seen as a party dominated by Yadavs, is looking to consolidate the 40 per cent Muslim vote in the region in its favour, with an eye to the next parliamentary elections.

On the other hand, the Sangh Parivar, apparently rejuvenated by the appointment of Amit Shah, a close aide of Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi, as the BJP general secretary in charge of U.P., has successfully managed to feed the now-consolidated Hindus its theory of “hurt majority sentiment”. This became clear during this correspondent’s conversations with the Jats and other Hindu communities.

“Narendra Modi is the only leader in India who can show the Muslims their place. We are determined to put up a united fight or our women will not be able to step out,” a Jat in Muzaffarnagar said. This sentiment was reflected in almost all the villages Frontline visited. “The Hindus have come together. We do not believe in caste identities such as Jat and Harijan,” a Bajrang Dal activist in Kawal said. The BJP, clearly, is trying to forge caste unity aggressively within an overarching Hindu identity. Since it already has the traditional support of the trader communities and upper castes, it is trying to win over the other backward classes and Dalits. Since western U.P. is a non-Yadav belt, it will not face any direct clash with the S.P.

The Rashtriya Lok Dal (RLD), headed by Ajit Singh and traditionally considered a Jat party, has lost much of its steam. It had to contend with 10 seats in the 2012 Assembly elections. It could win only one of the three seats even in its stronghold, Baghpat. “Ajit Singh has evidently parted ways with Muslims. The first instance of it was when he allied with the BJP in 2001 and kept shifting sides since then. Over the last few years, the Jats have been drifting towards the BJP. His father, Charan Singh, remained invincible because he was able to forge a strong Jat-Muslim alliance,” political analyst Sudhir Panwar said.

The BJP is also relying on a few Dalit communities, especially Valmikis. According to a survey by the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, organised by psephologist Yogendra Yadav, the share of Valmiki votes for the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), an Ambedkarite party known for its social justice agenda, dropped from 71 per cent in 2007 to 42 per cent in the 2012 Assembly elections, and the share of Jatav and other Scheduled Caste votes showed a similar decline, from 86 per cent to 62 per cent and from 58 per cent to 45 per cent respectively. The events in Shamli in the first week of September corroborate the BJP’s calculations.

Following a tiff between a Valmiki and Muslims in Shamli on September 4, a few Valmikis were arrested. A few members of the Valmiki community beat up some Muslims. After the incident, the traders of the area, on the BJP’s diktat, downed shutters demanding the release of the arrested Valmikis and sought the transfer of the Shamli Superintendent of Police, who was incidentally a Muslim. A few months ago, BJP leader Hukum Singh organised a massive dharna when a Valmiki minor girl was raped, and demanded the police officer’s transfer saying that he was partial towards Muslims. Fearing another backlash, the government transferred the officer on September 10.

“The BJP-led agitations in the past two years against administrative failure have taken place only in connection with criminal cases [especially sexual crime cases] in which Muslims were perceived as culpable,” an editor of a regional daily told Frontline.

Rajan Pandey, the author of a recently released book, Battleground U.P, Politics in the Land of Ram, points to similar trends. “The leader of the Muzaffarnagar riots was Sangeet Som, a Thakur leader, who had won a highly communal election against Hazi Yaqoub Qureshi in Sardhana near Muzaffarnagar. Qureshi is the one who issued a fatwa against the Danish cartoonist who had shown the Prophet in a bad light and had also announced a reward of Rs.50 lakh for anyone who could get his head. As in western Uttar Pradesh, the BJP has also successfully polarised Hindu votes in Rohilkhand [also in western U.P comprising Bareilly and Pilibhit, which Varun Gandhi represents and where he is known to have given inflammatory speeches]. More than 100 big and small communal riots have happened in the last two years. In most riots, it is clear that the BJP had a role to play by fuelling emotions and spreading rumours and organising muscle power. The idea is to definitely consolidate Hindu votes before the 2014 elections,” he said.

Change in riot pattern

The recent riots were different from the earlier ones in that almost all of them were triggered in rural areas and advanced to cities and nearby towns. In the history of riots in independent India, riots have been known to advance from cities to villages. In western U.P, the BJP has institutionalised two aspects of its communal programme centred on the honour of rural Jats. One aspect is what the Sangh Parivar calls “love jehad” and the other is its rumour machinery. The Sangh Parivar campaigns claim that good-looking Muslim young men are identified and trained in madrassas to woo Hindu women. They are given mobile phones and motorbikes, which they can use to pursue Hindu women who eventually fall for them as they are also trained to be modern. If the Hindu woman resists, the Muslim youth will indulge in rape, molestation or eve-teasing, the Hindu nationalists claim. As most mobile phone shops are run by landless Muslims in the region, the Sangh Parivar offers an easy substantiation of its claims, too. Last year, a khap panchayat in western U.P. banned women from carrying mobile phones, a decision that was endorsed by the mahapanchayat of all khaps.

Most Jats Frontline talked to after the riots said that Muslims targeted their women and it was for this reason that they organised the mahapanchayat. “Will you not save your sister if an anti-social person tries to abuse her?” a Jat asked.

Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) leader Ashok Singhal, in a press statement, reiterated this hypothesis while justifying the riot: “The stalking and felonious behaviour of the ‘love jehadis’ with a Hindu girl student returning from Kisaan Inter-College was the immediate provocation for the grave incidents that took place in Kawal on August 27. The root cause is the ‘lust jehad’ being conducted under the garb of Muslim religion. This incident gave birth to the convening of the Bahu, Beti Bachao Mahapanchayat. When society could no longer bear the ‘love jehadists’ outraging the modesty and dignity of Hindu women and girls in rural and urban areas of U.P., the corrective movement in the form of the Bahu, Beti Bachao Mahapanchayat came into being.”

This save your honour propaganda is supported by a hyperactive rumour with misleading videos about Muslim men. Along with this, the old Hindutva rhetoric stereotyping Muslims as cow slaughterers, as reproductive machines who do not believe in family planning, as criminals and black marketeers is constantly fed. This is then backed up by the theory that an increasing Muslim population is a threat to the Hindu identity. Most Jats in Kawal knew that the population of Muslims, who were fewer than the Hindus during the 2007 parliamentary elections, had increased now. “In Kawal, there are 7,300 voters now and Muslims have 900 votes more than the Hindus,” one Jat woman said. This fact was supported by other Jat and Muslim households. A closer look at the riots also reveals that most rioting happened where Muslims and Hindus are almost equal in numbers, and not in villages where one community is in a clear majority. The BJP has been projecting the S.P government as a namazwadi sarkar, that is, a pro-Muslim and anti-Hindu government. It has been largely successful as the State government has not done much to regain its confidence among the general public. The destruction of Muslim property and loss of lives has irked many Muslims and most of them feel the previous BSP government was better in terms of providing security. The Muslim sentiment is reflected in the statement issued by the renowned Islamic seminary, Darul Uloom Deoband, in the adjoining Sahranpur district. It has criticised the State government for failing to check the violence in Muzaffarnagar. It said that the administration allowed the tensions to simmer and that conditions were created for a full-scale riot.

The city remains under curfew. In such circumstances, the largely perceptible hurt sentiments of the Hindus can stoke further violence unless the government starts to think beyond immediate political gains and controls the tension effectively.


Try to write the truth rather fabrication.
And many a times while reading the article I felt you are writing a judgement and not a news article.
from:  Ashish Srivastav
Posted on: Oct 2, 2013 at 16:08 IST
Why does Frontline insist on keeping its acdemic neutrality at stake by
keeping its agenda of always putting d blame on bjp or rss wherever d 2 are
involved.A mere mention of Azam khan' name would have at least given it a
semblance of unbiasedness.strange mindset!!
from:  navjyot singh
Posted on: Oct 2, 2013 at 06:45 IST
your article said the half truth, you have jumped to declare one party
guilty by giving the example of 4 sept meeting without mentioning
previous meeting by particular community. i think not u but your whole
lot is partial and always declare the majority guilty.
from:  vijay kumar
Posted on: Sep 28, 2013 at 08:24 IST
A completely biased article, presenting only one side! You people are got exposed and now it will be very difficult to cheat. Anyway it is intellectual dishonesty!
from:  Arun
Posted on: Sep 27, 2013 at 07:45 IST
a biased mention of automatic weapons and of the SP leader whose pics were seen on TV giving speeches.
you put all blame on one party and ur research over?
from:  vikas
Posted on: Sep 26, 2013 at 20:31 IST
whatever happened was really bad. riots happen all over the world and
bjp or modi can't be blamed for every riot in the world. i feel the
article is biased against one party. riots make life hell for people.
from:  ashish
Posted on: Sep 23, 2013 at 22:29 IST
There are varied stories about what was the immediate cause. Even this article fails to reveal what exactly the altercation was? Was it result of molestation? The truth about much talked about 'love jihad'. Facts should be brought before public instead of keeping us in the dark.
from:  Surendra Mishra
Posted on: Sep 22, 2013 at 11:41 IST
Whatever happened in Muzaffar Nagar it is quite clear that ulterior motives were involved by both SP and BJP. Politicians from both sides were responsible for fanning the religious hatred for political gains. It is disgusting and must be condemned unequivocally. The SP government's inept administration has lot to answer for. Those whoever involved in this bloodbath must be punished and banned from politics for their rest of life.
from:  Haider
Posted on: Sep 21, 2013 at 22:59 IST
Hindu and Muslim communalism both are ideologically responsible for communal Riots in Muzaffarnagar area. BJP and SP both are playing communal card in greed of so called vote bank. Whole of the vicious communal atmosphere was being built since last few months, Kawal village unfortunate incidents only lit the fire in already stretched communal BAARUD in whole area.
from:  prabhat kumar roy
Posted on: Sep 21, 2013 at 16:59 IST
Frontline, i urge you to ensure a piece which meticulously weighs both
sides of the story. you have failed to mention the august 30th meeting
where MLA'S AND MEMBERS OF SP,CONGRESS AND BSP were seen instigating
the mob for 'revenge and honour'. More so a private TV channels sting
operation has pointed out to the involvement of a Muslim SP leader
itself!. so, to blame BJP and RSS is absolutely bereft of any logic.
It has become a fashionable trend these days among st the media and
magazine houses. i hope this was but a minor aberration to your
otherwise non-judgmental and well researched articles.
from:  shashank shekhar
Posted on: Sep 21, 2013 at 08:33 IST
The article is well written but it bias toward Samajwadi Party and puts
the entire blame on BJP as the sole party responsible for riots.The
article is trying to hide the inefficiency of state government in
controlling the riots.
from:  gauri
Posted on: Sep 20, 2013 at 23:08 IST
Nicely written but its the same old piece of pseudo secularism, the
article is all about vilifying BJP/Hindu Right wing. There is no
mention of the 30th August meeting in Muzzaffarnagar, when after the
Friday prayers, many Muslim leaders from SP, BSP and Congress and
Muslim bureaucrats, gave passionate communal speeches, incited Muslims
to carry out violence against Hindus in the region. The Mahapanchayats
were held after that meeting, as a retaliotary show of strength.
Hindus coming from this Panchayat were ambushed by Muslims, which say
a massive retaliation by the Jats, which led to so many deaths. It is
SP which is in power in UP, not BJP. Why did SP let it all happen?
from:  Ishant
Posted on: Sep 20, 2013 at 11:50 IST
why is BJP being targeted? whose responsibility is it to maintain peace? riots were clearly fanned by SP to consolidate its own vote bank and Congress and BSP sat quite to reap the benefits afterwards. SP is in state govt., Congress is in centre even then riots are BJP's making? i would certainly expect from a magazine like Frontline to do unbiased reporting instead of playing in the hands of SECULARISTS.
from:  avinash kumar saurav
Posted on: Sep 19, 2013 at 23:32 IST
The article scales new rhetorical heights. Firstly, it ignores the
most glaring aspect of the whole story: there was an abject failure of
administrative machinery. Why was it so is another story altogether.
Secondly, the tone here suggests as if the article has been jumbled
together with keeping BJP at the center.
Thirdly, it tries to paint the whole story in saffron and the
journalist would have done better to talk to some "genuine" stake
holders instead of few handpicked ones.
Fourthly, the unbalanced portrayal seems exacerbated with the patent
omission of the clear chronological order in which the events did take
place in conjunction with the administrative measures adopted to curb
the violence.
Lastly, it would have been better had the journalist inquired into the
role of political leadership of all the parties concerned instead of
focusing solely on BJP.
At the end, indeed its the article itself that takes the form of
rhetoric rather than the BJP as it attempts to portray.
from:  Sheelbhadra
Posted on: Sep 19, 2013 at 23:26 IST
The Muzafarnagar incident is shameful. Madhur's comments are true. I'd
like to add that instead of media, supporting these vote bank politics,
it should act responsibly. Now a days coloring anything with saffron has
become the meaning of SECULARISM. A fellow is not considered secular
unless he hurts the majority by pulling out a saffron card. I mean,
whats wrong with being a hindu and a Nationalist ?
from:  Srihari
Posted on: Sep 19, 2013 at 01:00 IST
Well written piece however you would have done well to investigate the laxity in administrations deployment of troops. I am no fan of Modi or BJP but its just too good a coincidence that the agitation/ Manahpanchayat was organised and happened inspite of section 144 in the area.
Any objective reading of the situation would not paint Saffron as the guilty party, as the write up here tries to do. The cyclist are just as bad, as are the others.
from:  Madhur
Posted on: Sep 18, 2013 at 16:09 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
Volume: 32
Issue: 11
Issue Date: 12-06-2015



Sashi Kumar

Acting the age

Culture and demographics dictate that the Indian movie star remains a forever-young Peter Pan desper»


C.P. Chandrasekhar

Jaitley on the MAT

The Finance Minister decides to go soft on FIIs on the issue of Minimum Alternate Tax, fearing their»

Ambedkar's Legacy

Address by N. Ram at the 75th Convocation of the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai. Read more »

Post Offices as Banking Institutions

A report that seeks to integrate threads of India’s financial inclusion dynamics and recognise the role post offices could play with their homespun technology. Read more »

Rights in Review - The Supreme Court in 2014

The Supreme Court of India is the foremost guardian of fundamental rights and the spirit of the Constitution. While a lot of attention is paid to the pendency of cases and media coverage of high-profile litigation, less attention has been paid to the Supreme Court’s protection of fundamental rights. This Rights Review aims to do this with a careful analysis of key Supreme Court cases on fundamental rights. This Review is the first of an annual series to be released each December. Read more »


Himalayan fault lines
 Thank you Mr. Ramachandran for this piece. I have long enjoyed your articles and i often learn from them....»
posted by Doctor Hank   on May 25, 2015 at 04:04 IST

The IAS today
 India being a diversified country stands one due to the system of All India Services. The political interference in their work culture, may ...»
posted by Chendra Shekkar RedE   on May 23, 2015 at 12:37 IST

Violence and victory
 Still after 68 years of independence the conduction of elections suffers domestic violence, malpractices, rigging. Election commission is fa...»
posted by G M Rehaman   on May 26, 2015 at 19:53 IST


Please remember to logout of facebook after you complete this session.



Recent Article in The Nation

Back in India after the Round Table Conference in London, B.R. Ambedkar and Gandhi arrived at a compromise on reservation of seats and signed the Poona Pact on September 24, 1932, to enable Gandhi to call off his fast. Here, M.R. Jayakar, Tej Bahadur Sapru and Ambedkar at Yerwada jail on the day the pact was signed.

Ambedkar, Gandhi & Jinnah

The inner history of the negotiations to give recognition to the untouchables as a separate political entity. By A.G. NOORANI »